Data-driven supervision is imperative to conducting supervisory activities in the twenty-first century. Converging trends show that becoming a data-driven supervisor is now obligatory. These converging trends were clearly articulated by Jo Ann Barefoot in her vision of “Regulation 2.0” a few years back, which continues to be highly relevant.
Barefoot made six broad points:
-
There is a need for resilience and adaptability in regulatory and supervisory frameworks. Consider COVID-19, which had far-reaching implications for all economic activities, including DFS. These types of exogenous shocks will occur, and supervisors will need to quickly adapt.
-
Technology is constantly evolving and advancing, and supervisors must keep up. DFS, by its nature, shifts and changes as technology does. It is therefore critical that supervisory authorities increase their technological readiness and modernise their data systems. An example of this is the adoption of cloud computing.
-
A range of stakeholders recognise and acknowledge that current regulatory and supervisory models are outdated and require urgent improvement, modernisation, and adaptation. Supervisory authorities are compelled to set themselves up to regularly evolve and keep pace with changes in the industry.
-
Generational turnover is resulting, and will continue to result, in a greater willingness to overhaul established practices that outgoing supervisors may have been reluctant to change.
-
Generative AI can lower the barriers to adoption with references to data-driven approaches to supervision. With correct modelling and appropriate, responsible use, it can be a powerful tool for supervisors moving towards data-driven supervision.
-
Globally, there is a shift in political influences and how these converge with technology, AI, and tech users. Supervisory authorities are now, more than ever, working to maintain independence and technical excellence in order to avoid political interference.
In short, DFS is a fast-evolving field that leverages new data types, as well as innovative approaches to analytics and digitally native business models. DFS supervisors need a foundational set of knowledge and tools to keep pace with these evolving changes. These innovations introduce unique risks, necessitating a shift toward data-driven supervision.
Becoming data-driven requires changing how one views data. Supervisory data needs to be of the highest quality, relevant to what is required, and accessible. Only then can supervisors begin to adopt modern Supervisory Technology (SupTech) tools to generate actionable insights.
However, it is not enough for supervisory authorities to simply use more data. The shift to becoming data-driven must be managed appropriately within the organisation.
Often, technology itself is not the main issue or the biggest obstacle; the human element is frequently overlooked. Implementing significant changes in systems, infrastructure, and work processes to support supervisors in becoming technology-savvy and data-driven can feel uncomfortable for people working in these roles. This change must be managed carefully because, without proper management and consideration, these shifts tend to fail in achieving the desired results.
This module will delve deeper into the journey to becoming a data-driven supervisor. It will cover issues such as approaches to supervisory data, how to improve data quality, and how to use technology, including AI-powered SupTech tools. It will also highlight the importance of understanding and mitigating the risks associated with the increasing use of technology for supervisory purposes.
Let’s begin with a video that outlines the steps supervisors can take to become data-driven.
If you have trouble playing this video, you can access an alternative player here.
Additional Reading:
To further your understanding of supervisory tools for risk-based supervision, we recommend you read the following:
- Cook, N., Alliance for Innovative Regulation, 2024, From Legacy Systems to Cutting Edge Tech: A Financial Regulator’s Odyssey.
- Cook, N. and Narayan, S., Alliance for Innovative Regulation, 2025, Beyond Pilots and Sandboxes: Regulatory Innovation through SupTech Case studies and Leading Practices.
- CGAP, 2026, Digital Innovation.
- Dias, D., CGAP, 2026, CGAP upcoming publication.
Reflection Questions for Discussion
Remember that one of the aims of this course is for you to apply what you learn to your own context. As in Modules 1 and 2, we will continue to provide you with questions for reflection. These questions are specifically designed to get you to reflect on your country and context.
We encourage you to respond to these questions using the forum functionality, sharing your reflections and insights with your fellow students. In this way, we hope to encourage collaboration and the building of a community of supervisors.
Here are the first reflection questions for this module:
- Is your organisation considering or preparing any type of internal reform project that would help you become a data-driven DFS supervisor?
- Does the project only deal with increasing the quantity and frequency of data, or does it cover other aspects, such as organisational and capacity-related, that are needed for a transformative change?